RuleReview
Review a contract before it lists. Paste proposed settlement language and the published RuleScore rubric returns a language-risk score and a separate event-execution prior, calibrated against a historical disputed-market corpus and control comparison — with every detected hazard quoted, ways to reduce ambiguity, similar sourced cases, and a regulatory-sensitivity read. Deterministic and entirely in your browser — nothing you paste is uploaded.
Built for exchanges, DCM applicants, market operators, and compliance/legal teams re-papering listings against the June 2026 CFTC NPRM. The same rubric that grades live markets, run on your draft, pre-filing. Professional drafting and redlining support: RuleDraft. RuleReview is not legal advice.
Deterministic: the same normalized title, rules, source, and venue produce the same grade — the receipt identifies that complete rating input.
⚖
Your review appears here — the language-risk / event-execution split, every hazard quoted with how to gate it off, similar past failures, and a SHA-256 receipt.
Brierly grades are editorial opinions about contract language under a published methodology — they estimate the risk that settlement is contested, never the outcome and never the merits of a resolution. This is a standardized analysis of the text you pasted, not tailored advice. The regulatory-sensitivity read is a heuristic flag, not legal advice.